A registered Florida sex-offender has obtained custody of a child that he has admitted in Court documents that is not biologically his. The case of Donald Coleman and his presumed daughter Miranda Wilkerson is an interesting one, and presents the harsh reality of certain family law and child custody issues that can arise in a divorce. Coleman, approximately 51 years old, was married to Miranda’s mother Trista Crews, who died in a car accident approximately one month after Miranda was born. Coleman and Crews had two children together aside form Miranda.

Coleman was required to register as a sex offender after he impregnated Trista when she was 14 and he was 38 years old. They married soon thereafter. However, when Miranda was born Coleman and Crews were in the middle of a divorce where Coleman asserted that Miranda was the child of another man. Miranda was raised and lived with her maternal grandmother Rita Manning.

However, since Crews died, Coleman has asserted his right to custody of his “daughter” Miranda. Further, since he was married to her mother at the time, he is presumed to be the father of any child born of that marriage. Moreover, the true father has seemingly failed to assert any paternity rights. In a grand twist of irony, Coleman managed to wrest custody of Miranda by asserting that grandmother Manning was a danger to Miranda because she was charged with child neglect in 1997 – for allowing 14 year old Trista to be impregnated by Coleman.

This scenario could not occur in Illinois. Even though a man is presumed to be the father of a child born during his marriage to the mother (750 ILCS 45/5), a father convicted of a sex offense cannot have custody or visitation rights unless the mother or the child’s guardian consents. (750 ILCS 45/6.5).

Information posted in this blog is not meant to constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about your legal rights, please contact an attorney.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

As the same sex couple Carole Briggs and Rose Adams found out, the protections of the Illinois Civil Union Act, allowing same sex couples to marry, do not travel across state lines. As stated in this article, Adams lives in Arkansas, a state which does not recognize same-sex marriage or same-sex unions. Therefore, even though they receive protection under Illinois law, if they choose to live in Arkansas they will still be without the status and protections (e.g., the ability to visit in the hospital in an emergency situation.).

The article did make clear, however, that when a same-sex couple is applying for a  license in Illinois to enter a civil union under the Civil Union Act, they have a right to the license even though the union may be illegal in their home state. There is a certification that applicants have to sign in order to obtain the license that the union would not be illegal in the home state. However, this certification applies to situations involving age of consent and familial relations (i.e. first cousins marrying, or underage marriages.)

Information posted in this blog is not meant to constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about your legal rights, please contact an attorney.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

According to the Smoking Gun, An Indiana man shared his plans to usurp his children in a child custody battle with his ex-wife’s fake Facebook account. Angela Voelkert created a fake Facebook profile under the name “Jessica Studebaker” and used a picture of a comely 17 year old girl (origin unknown), then befriended her estranged husband David Voelkert online. After exchanging e-mails, which were written by a friend of Angela’s to disguise her writing style, her husband shared salacious information, including that he intended to take his children to another state after divorce proceedings had finished. He also stated that he wanted his ex-wife killed and that perhaps “Jessica” know some gangbangers that could “bust a cap in her” for $10k. He subsequently asked her to erase the e-mail so there was no trace of the plan.

David Voelkert, who sells and installs video and surveillance equipment, also confessed that he placed a tracking/listening device in his ex-wife’s car so he could monitor her. The FBI charged him with illegally installing the device. The charges were later dismissed.

Information posted in this blog is not meant to constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about your legal rights, please contact an attorney.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment